ESN Success: Give People What They Want, But Don’t Forget Strategy

The subject of engagement is a hot topic at the moment, and several great articles have been written and research conducted on the role it plays in growing your Enterprise Social Network (ESN). Yammer’s own Mike Grafham and Maria Ogneva have done an excellent job of covering the subject thus far. While I’m still relatively new to the Yammer Customer Success Team, engagement is at the center of a lot of the work I do. Here are some observations learned on the CSM team, and prior to joining Yammer.

What is engagement? Here’s how I see it: Engagement is the degree to which your community is participating collectively in any given endeavour to achieve meaningful and measurable outcomes that create value for the community and enterprise as a whole. To really foster engagement, you need to have a strategy (what do you want the network to do?) and an adoption method (how will you get people to participate in a meaningful way?). The fallacy is to overly focus on one without the other. If you focus on everyone using social without tying it to business objectives, your organisation will fail to see meaningful business value; the network will just meander until people abandon it. If you focus too much on the strategy without thinking through the user experience, your best-laid plans will fall flat, because people won’t participate. Social is voluntary – you can’t make people share – and requires a shift in our thinking as we consider our approaches.

Letting users choose

Across ESN platforms, I’ve seen these commonalities contribute to more meaningful adoption (and Yammer fares pretty well across this list, I’d say):

  • Freemium model: In 2010, Gartner predicted over 70 percent of IT-mandated social media initiatives would fail. CIOs now see voluntary (viral) adoption as a way to set up a social initiative for success, and the freemium model is a great way to de-risk the value proposition for them. Because cost-based barriers to entry do not exist, anyone can sign up at a company and get started – the company doesn’t pay anything until the adoption of the product in their enterprise is proven.
  • Ease of use: I’ve used many systems and Yammer is by far the easiest to use. This goes a long way to facilitating adoption.
  • Similarity to consumer social tools: An ESN built around the paradigm of consumer software and developed for business use cases has a greater likelihood of success due to familiarity with existing social tools.
  • People focused: An ESN  has a focus on people, simple conversations and collaboration much more than other systems that often focus on documents, functions, etc.

Driving deliberate strategy

The ease of use and virality of a platform like Yammer can be deceivingly simple and lead people to think that a deliberate strategy is not necessary. That’s a mistake, because without direction and an end goal in mind, the network will simply meander and fail to deliver business value. These are the two most common misperceptions that we’ve seen:

  • That no intervention is required to make an ESN grow – it will just happen naturally
  • That there are no barriers to adoption that need to be overcome

Despite the fact that, with the right platform, you could achieve and maintain viral growth with your ESN, and this growth could all be done organically with very little intervention, I believe there are some hard realities for the average organisation. The above-average organisation has a naturally open, transparent and collaborative culture; and engagement on an ESN, where these things are key, is somewhat more assured to succeed. But most organisations have to work very hard at engagement – see this excellent article which relates how Phoebe Venkat at Tyco International has to do some heavy lifting to get traction at her organisation with Yammer. And the reality of an ESN is that – unlike with a public social network like Facebook – work, compliance, security and risk dynamics make this a very different beast. Here is a diagram that outlines what I believe are the key considerations for growing your ESN; you will see that strategy and guided direction play a very important role.

Addressing barriers to adoption

Across the customers I’ve worked with, I’ve observed some of these common barriers to adoption; most of these are implicitly put in place and could easily be avoided:

  • Putting viral adoption on hold while an agreement on a platform is put in place
  • Having overly restrictive structures, policies and guidelines in place
  • Having senior executives mandate adoption
  • Having too many conflicting social systems in place demanding attention
  • Having no adoption – there’s nothing more off-putting than graveyard communities where nothing happens

Taking steps to success

So what do you do next? I wrote up some recommendations, sourced from what I’ve seen working across customer companies. I see there being three distinct buckets:

  1. Purpose, value and leadership (how you build out and enable an internal case for the programme),
  2. The right interaction elements (creating an environment that encourages interaction in person and via technology), and
  3. Culture and community dynamics (gently propelling the community towards meeting a common goal, without too much overengineering).

Purpose, value and leadership:

  • Clearly articulated purpose, executive sponsorship/involvement and communications programme
  • Business use cases focused on value and benefits, and combined with metrics and analytics
  • Participation-related rewards programme (gamification or actual rewards programme)

The right interaction elements:

  • Easy to use and intuitive social technology
  • Social technology that is truly focused on people, conversations and work outcomes
  • Physical events that augment or spur online action and capture offline actions, ideas, etc.

Culture and community dynamics

  • Community manager(s) in place with usage guidelines and policies to support the network, stoke the conversation fires, further best practices and develop use cases.
  • An open and transparent culture that is authentic and encourages participation
  • Training programmes and useful help guides, webinars, videos, screencasts, etc.

If you can think of any more points you’d like to add, or if you’d like to dispute any of the points mentioned above, please let me know by posting a comment.

This entry was posted in Best Practices and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to ESN Success: Give People What They Want, But Don’t Forget Strategy

  1. Great post Stephen!
    The only thing I could come up with to add, was the use – or encouragement – to build teams based on topics, amongst the employees. I realize that this is happening “as you go”, but sometimes it can create immense collaboration, if you make it (semi) mandatory, that you have recruited a team that supports your topic…You could even go as far as setting out guidelines (or mandatories) of the diversity of the team. Example; Engineering company where some engineers are discussing a solution/challenge via ie. Yammer, great knowledge emerges from the discussion – and these are now ready to “tap”….but one thing is that the engineers involved in the discussion feels that they have come up with the “goodies” – but would the result have been different if they were “forced” to include product development, marketing, sales, r&d etc. at the start of the discussion ?..my take is – most probably;-)…This is one example – but I hope my explanation clarifies that one of the challenges with engagement – is to not only achieve engagement – but also to get diversified engagement. People tend to group up based on existing titles, position, roles etc. – the challenge here is to encourage them to break out of these “comfort zones”, to enable more valuable and diversified discussions, cross cultural engagement and results!

    • Many thanks for the feedback Michael and sorry for my late response :)

      So if I understand correctly you are suggesting breaking down discussions so that they not only focus on a certain subject matter but also cover topics as you put them. As I understand these topics, they would ensure that any discussion is filtered through certain business criteria that would ensure its relevance and diversity. In other words discussions should be gated so that they address certain requirements, engineers could cover business topics as you mention, general business folk could cover design topics for instance, etc.

      Have I understood this correctly?

  2. Rusmat Ahmed says:

    Tremendous summary & guide! Highlighted the key Cultural aspect well too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>